How AI-generated course content is reviewed by humans before it reaches learners — and our commitment to independent external auditing.
AESOP AI Academy course content is generated by the patent-pending AESOP Engine and reviewed by our editorial team before publication. No AI-generated content reaches learners without mandatory human review — this is enforced as a technical constraint in our publishing workflow, not just a policy goal.
The AESOP Advisory Board reviews curriculum content for accuracy, relevance, and appropriate representation. Board member profiles and credentials are published at aesopacademy.org/about/advisory-board.
| Review Type | Frequency | Performed By | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-publication human review | Every module before launch | Curriculum lead | ✓ Operational |
| Independent human audit | Annual | Independent third-party reviewer | First audit scheduled Q3 2026 |
Educators, learners, and procurement staff may report content concerns at any time. We will review and respond to all reports.
Bias auditing is not a compliance checkbox for AESOP — it is core to our mission. We teach AI literacy, which necessarily includes teaching learners to identify and critique bias in AI systems. We cannot do that credibly unless our own content models the same rigor we ask learners to apply.
We commit to publishing the results of our first independent external audit when it is complete (Q3 2026) and to annual transparency reporting thereafter.