Automation, displacement, and the transformation of work.
Between 2000 and 2010, US manufacturing lost about 5.6 million jobs. Economists debated how much was automation vs. trade. The debate continues with AI: a 2023 Goldman Sachs report estimated generative AI could affect 300 million full-time jobs globally — not necessarily eliminating them, but transforming what those jobs involve. Some economists emphasize job creation from new industries; others emphasize that historical job transitions took decades and caused real suffering for the people in transition.
The economics of AI and employment is genuinely contested:
Economists disagree about AI's net employment effects. What's clear: the transition costs are real, unevenly distributed, and policy can either mitigate or amplify them.
4 questions — free, untracked, retake anytime.
does 'task displacement' mean in the context of AI and employment?
is the 'transition problem' significant even if total employment stays stable?
workers face the highest displacement risk from AI?
does an 'automation tax' proposal aim to do?
Develop a policy framework for AI-driven employment transition.
Analyze AI employment effects and develop a policy framework.
Disinformation, algorithmic amplification, and AI's effects on political systems.
The 2024 US election cycle saw the first widespread use of AI-generated political content: synthetic audio of candidates, AI-written targeted ads, and AI-generated voter suppression messages. A January 2024 robocall used a voice clone of President Biden discouraging New Hampshire Democrats from voting in the primary. The call was illegal — but it reached thousands of voters before being identified. Election security researchers noted that the marginal cost of influence operations had dropped to near zero.
None of these safeguards are sufficient alone. The asymmetry between generating synthetic content (cheap, fast) and detecting and correcting it (expensive, slow) is fundamental — and gets worse as generation quality improves.
4 questions — free, untracked, retake anytime.
made the 2024 Biden voice clone robocall significant?
is 'epistemic collapse' as a democratic risk from AI?
is the 'fundamental asymmetry' in synthetic political content?
does algorithmic amplification distort democratic discourse?
Develop a governance framework for AI and democracy.
Analyze AI's democratic risks and develop a governance framework.
Diagnostic AI, drug discovery, and the transformation of medicine.
In 2020, DeepMind's AlphaFold solved protein structure prediction — a 50-year grand challenge in biology. Within two years, it had predicted structures for nearly all known proteins, accelerating drug discovery across diseases from malaria to cancer. Simultaneously, diagnostic AI systems for radiology, pathology, and ophthalmology began outperforming human specialists on specific tasks. The promise of AI in healthcare is significant and real. So are the risks: biased training data, over-reliance on AI diagnosis, and questions about who benefits from AI-driven healthcare advances.
AlphaFold's protein predictions are publicly available — anyone can use them. This is the exception, not the rule. Most healthcare AI is proprietary. Who benefits from AI healthcare advances depends heavily on how IP and access are structured.
4 questions — free, untracked, retake anytime.
was AlphaFold's protein structure prediction a landmark achievement?
is the 'access inequality' risk in healthcare AI?
is automation bias particularly dangerous in clinical settings?
makes diagnostic AI both promising and risky?
Develop a framework for equitable healthcare AI deployment.
Analyze the distribution of benefits and risks from AI in healthcare.
Personalized learning, academic integrity, and the transformation of education.
Within weeks of ChatGPT's release in late 2022, teachers reported a wave of AI-generated essays. Schools responded with everything from bans to AI detectors (which proved unreliable). But the more significant disruption may be structural: if AI can complete most standard academic assignments, what is education for? Some educators argued for redesigning assessment around tasks AI can't do; others argued that AI is a tool students should learn to use, as calculators were a tool math students learned to use.
If AI can do most of what we ask students to do, we need to ask: what skills does being human in an AI world require — and design education to build those.
4 questions — free, untracked, retake anytime.
is the most significant structural disruption AI poses to education?
calculator analogy for AI in education suggests:
is the 'learning vs. credential' risk in educational AI use?
is the equity concern about AI tutoring tools?
Design a framework for AI in education.
Design a framework for AI in education that maximizes benefits and minimizes harms.
Energy consumption, climate modeling, and AI's environmental double role.
Training GPT-4 was estimated to consume roughly the equivalent of a small country's electricity for several weeks. Inference — running queries on deployed models — consumes energy continuously at scale. A Goldman Sachs analysis estimated that a ChatGPT query uses roughly 10x the energy of a Google search. At the same time, AI is being used for climate modeling, energy grid optimization, materials discovery for clean energy, and reducing logistics inefficiencies. AI is simultaneously a significant contributor to energy demand and a potential tool for addressing climate change.
Whether AI is net positive or negative for climate depends on whether its applications to climate solutions outpace its energy footprint — a question that depends heavily on policy, energy sourcing, and which AI applications are prioritized.
4 questions — free, untracked, retake anytime.
is a ChatGPT query more energy-intensive than a Google search?
does AI's 'environmental double role' mean?
does the carbon footprint of training a model vary by location?
would determine whether AI is net positive or negative for climate?
Develop a climate policy framework for AI.
Analyze AI's environmental impact and develop a climate policy framework for AI.
How AI's benefits and harms are distributed — and what drives the distribution.
A 2021 study by researchers at MIT found that facial recognition systems had substantially higher error rates for darker-skinned women than lighter-skinned men — up to 34 percentage points difference in some systems. These systems were being used in hiring platforms, law enforcement, and financial services. The people most harmed by the AI errors were also among the most vulnerable. AI systems deployed without equity consideration tend to amplify existing inequalities — because existing inequalities are embedded in the data and systems AI learns from.
Whether AI increases or decreases inequality depends almost entirely on who it's designed for, who has access to it, and who bears the cost of its errors. These are policy choices, not technical inevitabilities.
4 questions — free, untracked, retake anytime.
do AI systems deployed without equity consideration tend to amplify existing inequalities?
makes facial recognition errors in hiring or criminal justice more serious than average AI errors?
could AI tutoring reduce inequality if deployed equitably?
determines whether AI increases or decreases inequality?
Develop a comprehensive framework for AI equity.
Develop a comprehensive framework for AI equity.
6 questions covering all lessons. Free, untracked, retake anytime.
tends to automate specific tasks within jobs rather than eliminating jobs entirely. This is called:
fundamental challenge of AI-powered political disinformation is:
was significant for healthcare AI because:
'learning vs. credential' risk in educational AI use means:
'environmental double role' refers to:
AI increases or decreases inequality depends primarily on: